EXPECTED UTILITY AND PROSPECT THEORIES VERSUS AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE

Non-Expected Utility Theories: Weighted Expected, Rank Dependent, and, Cumulative Prospect Theory Utility by

Non-expected Utility Theories: Weighted Expected, Rank Dependent, and, Cumulative Prospect Theory Utility

Common Mathematical Foundations of Expected Utility and Dual Utility Theories

We show that the main results of the expected utility and dual utility theories can be derived in a unified way from two fundamental mathematical ideas: the separation principle of convex analysis, and integral representations of continuous linear functionals from functional analysis. Our analysis reveals the dual character of utility functions. We also derive new integral representations of du...

Department of Economics Why Do People Pay Taxes? Prospect Theory versus Expected Utility Theory

Tax evasion analysis is typically based on an expected utility theory (EUT) framework. However, this leads to several qualitative and quantitative puzzles. Given actual probabilities of audit and penalty rates the return on evasion ranges from 91-98 percent. So why don’t most of us evade? Furthermore, an EUT based analysis predicts that we should evade less as the tax rate increases (Yitzhaki p...

Calibration Results for Non-Expected Utility Theories∗

Rabin [23] proved that a low level of risk aversion with respect to small gambles leads to a high level of risk aversion with respect to large gambles. Rabin’s arguments strongly depend on expected utility theory, but we show in this paper that similar arguments apply to many non expected utility theories, and to a certain extent, to theories dealing with uncertainty as well.